The Next Great American President: Senator Barack Obama
Today, people all around the state of Iowa came out to caucus for someone, nobody thought could beat the political machine, Senator Barack Obama. Today, Iowans voted for change. They voted for a new direction in this country. Barack Obama's message of hope resounded with the people of this great nation. American might be saved because of the people of Iowa tonight. Barack Obama is unlike any other candidate in American history. He is someone who transcends parties and can reach out to those left behind by our system. In a government that has left so many behind, we need a leader with the ability to lead, not just empty experience that has breed conformity. I was wrong ever to support Hillary Clinton or John Edwards. They are not what our country needs. Barack Obama is what our nation needs. If we give up this man, then we are giving up an man who can save our nation from an all but certain doom. If we don't stand up and support this man, we could give up our nation's only hope. I am ready to believe again. I am ready to hope again. I am inspired. This is the new Democratic Party that combines the best of our former parties. We have the progressive agenda coupled with our commitment to working people in this nation. We can finally bridge this racial gap in this country with the first African American president. I ask you to join with me today in standing with this great American and to fight for our future. Bobby Kennedy never got this chance, neither did Martin Luther King. We have our chance. Let us rise up to this occasion, and take back our country for change. Say no to business as usual forever. Vote for Barack Obama.
Posted by Read Scott at 12:56 AM on Jan-04-2008 Comments (7)
Happy Thanksgiving!
Here at the Young Democrats Movement, we would like to wish everyone a happy Thanksgiving. We would also like to ask everyone to keep our troops fighting overseas in your thoughts and prayers this holiday. They cannot be with their families this holiday, so they greatly need our support. Thank you and have a great holiday!
Posted by Read Scott at 12:36 PM on Nov-22-2007
Support the Troops
Virginia's junior U.S. senator and freshman Democrat, Jim Webb will be introducing an excellent piece of legislation that brings both Republicans and Democrats together for a bill to support our troops. The Webb Amendment will allow troops to spend the same amount of time at home as they do in Iraq, which helps reduce the strain on our troops. We all know that this war is wrong, but we have to show a strong sign of support for our men and women in the armed forces. With the secure passage of this bill, we can show President Bush and Pro-War groups that we are not traitors, and that we support our troops 100%. If Republicans in congress fails to act or if the president vetoes, then it will show that their support for the troops is strictly political. The Democratic Party and the Young Democrats Movement supports this amendment and urges congress to pass it. This is a step in the right direction.
Here is the legislative fact sheet from Senator Webb's website, http://webb.senate.gov/:
FACTS ABOUT SENATOR WEBB’S BIPARTISAN DWELL TIME AMENDMENT September 17, 2007
"TITLE
An amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 to specify minimum periods between deployments of units and members of the Armed Forces deployed for Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.
SUMMARY & UPDATED LANGUAGE
The Amendment states that if a unit or a member of a regular component of the Armed Forces deploys to Iraq or Afghanistan, when their deployment ends they will have at least the same time at home before they are redeployed. No unit or member of a Reserve component, including the National Guard, could be redeployed to Iraq or Afghanistan within three years of their previous deployment.
The Amendment includes fair and reasonable waivers. In event of an operational emergency posing a vital threat to national security interests, the President may waive the amendment’s limitations by certifying to Congress that the deployment of the unit or member is necessary.
Updated language per conversation with Sec. Gates: After a conversation with Secretary of Defense Gates this week, Senator Webb accommodated his concerns with implementation by adding a 120-day enactment period. This will allow time for the Pentagon to plan, organize, and implement the new rotation policies. Previously, the amendment would have been effective immediately upon passage of the National Defense Authorization Act
RATIONALE
After four and a half years of combat operations, as the political debate continues we must provide our troops and their families with a more predictable operational tempo, with adequate time at home between deployments.
We are burning out our ground forces. We are seeing this in falling retention of experienced combat veterans, soldiers and Marines being recalled to active duty from the Individual Ready Reserve, and an increase in mental health issues arising from multiple deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.
CO-SPONSORS, SUPPORTERS
The amendment had 36 cosponsors when it was originally introduced in July. A total of 56 Senators voted for its passage, including 7 Republicans. Momentum continues to build.
Organizational Support and others:
• Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) and its 368,000 members [“If we are not better stewards of our troops and their families in the future than we have been in the recent past, MOAA believes strongly that we will be putting the all-volunteer force at unacceptable military risk.” Vice Admiral Norbert R. Ryan, Jr, USN (Ret.), president.] • National Military Families Association • Veterans for America • VoteVets.org • Major General Robert B. Newman Jr., the Adjutant General of Virginia
KEY POINTS MADE IN REMARKS BY SENATOR WEBB
• Regardless of your politics—whether you want to see troop withdrawal tomorrow or in years from now—this is about providing a safety net for our men and women in uniform. Period.
• After 4 ½ years of occupying Iraq, it is time for the availability of troops to dictate the operational tempo, and not the other way around. We need to be proper stewards of our men and women in uniform. We cannot continue to burn out our troops in this fashion.
• Extended, high-tempo deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan have adversely affected the readiness of Army and Marine Corps units. Their capability to respond quickly to other crises or contingencies around the world has been jeopardized.
• The amendment’s 1:1 deployment-to-dwell ratio for active units and members is a minimum floor. DOD’s historic policy and current goal is a ratio of 1:2. The Commandant of the Marine Corps has specifically reiterated this goal. Army units today deploy on a 0.75: 1 ratio, 15 months with 12 months at home. It is not unusual for Marines also to have less time at home than the length of their last deployment. By contrast, the British units deployed to Iraq have enjoyed a 4:1 ratio – six months in Iraq and two years at home.
• The authority vested in the Congress by the Constitution is clear. Article One, Section 8 of the Constitution vests Congress with the power to “make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces.” There is extensive legislative precedent for Congress to act to protect the welfare of our troops. In 1951, for example, at the height of the Korean War, Congress mandated that all personnel must receive full training for no less than 120 days before being deployed.
• In response to Friday’s remarks by Secretary Gates and General Pace: It is to be fully expected that the administration would oppose this amendment. The intention of the amendment is to rectify an inequity brought about by administration policies. Senator Webb had a personal discussion with Secretary Gates on Wednesday and modified the amendment to address his major concerns. It is an appropriate area for Congress to act, and we stand by the amendment."
Posted by Read Scott at 09:08 PM on Sep-17-2007 Comments (0)
Flat Out Betrayal
This week, the top commander in Iraq and the United States Ambassador to Iraq, went to congress to report on the status of the surge. The result: the Iraqi "Government" has failed to meet 15 of 18 benchmarks. Many Republicans said that September was do or die time for the surge. The President made it clear, what until this time in September and then make your judgment on Iraq. Has anything really changed? Absolutely not, at all. The administration is poised once again to give another blank check to this ineffective government in Iraq. When they don't meet the benchmarks the Bush Administration gives them more time. Time after time, this government has failed. Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador to Iraq, and the top commander, Gen. David Petraeus reported that we are "making progress" in Iraq, in spite of failing to meet our goals. The famous "Petraeus Report" painted a false view of Iraq, singling out any sort of anything that could possibly, maybe with one eye closed, and tilting your head slightly, be considered, "success" in Iraq. What has this surge brought? Greater outrage, distrust, and down right seething anger from a vast majority of Americans who want this war to end. However, it should also be noted that the so called, "Petraeus Report" was written by the Bush Administration with General Petraeus' name on it. I used to have a lot of respect for David Patreaus. I thought, despite our disagreements, he was a honorable American. However, he has shown that he is more loyal to a president who has shown to be the worst in history, rather then us, the American people. Tell, the truth. We know Iraq is in shambles, and quite frankly I am insulted by the quality of this report. Our tax dollars went to this stack of political trash? The Patraeus Report is a manifestation to what this administration thinks of the American people. They think we are stupid and will believe anybody that has four stars on their chest. Patraeus couldn't even say that America was safer because of the surge. He couldn't say if the troops' painful efforts and bravery was worth it. Was the almost 500 billion dollars worth it? Were the over 3700 deaths worth it? Can you answer that? What this President has done is spit in the face of every American, by lying to them once again. Times up. You failed. Game over. We cannot accept this administration anymore. They have failed America. They have shown a lack of respect for the American people, the troops, and their families. They have betrayed America. This war is no longer just stupid it is immoral and unAmerican. The true patriots are the troops. They ware true Americans, and the president has insulted everyone of them. We are not safer and we are not better off. If you want this war to end, go to the Iraq War Protest in Washington this Saturday, September 15th, 12 p.m. in front of the White House. Join your fellow Americans and end this war!
Posted by Read Scott at 07:18 PM on Sep-11-2007 Comments (0)
He Just Doesn't Get It
This whole summer, the Iraq Summer Campaign has targeted Congressman Mike Castle for his moderate stance on the war. This is a part of a larger campaign to target several Republicans who have taken moderate stances on the war. On Tuesday Aug. 28th, the Delaware Iraq Summer Campaign hosted their last event in Rodney Square. There were several speakers and Mike Castle was invited, but he turned it down naturally. What I think this shows is that our Congressman, has become grossly out of touch with the people of Delaware. For too long now, Congressman Castle has gone unchecked for his votes with this president. Viewing this, many Delawareans came together to call upon Castle to take a stand. He said that this campaign was simply partisan, that it was only targeting Republicans, and somehow this made our views invalid. But, what surprises me most is that Mike Castle still doesn't understand that the people are against this war. The people of Delaware have spoken loud and clear, they want this war to end. In addition to this, maybe Mr. Castle should get a hint that there is a reason that only Republicans are being targeted. Maybe, just maybe Mr. Castle this is a sign that the Republican Party hasn't taken the right position on the war. Now, granted there are a few Democrats who haven't taken the right position either, but the Party has made it clear it's overall position on this war. Mr. Castle doesn't understand that this is a sign of his party lack of good judgment on this war. Take a hint, Mr. Castle. Are you with the Republican Party or the people of Delaware? This war must end.
Posted by Read Scott at 12:36 PM on Aug-31-2007 Comments (1)
Why I Am A Democrat!
Okay, so i got my voting card in the mail a few weeks ago and I decided that it would be a good idea to write the reasons why I decided (and this decision was made long ago) to register as a DEMOCRAT!
WHY I AM A DEMOCRAT!
I am a Democrat because I because I believe that government should be proactive, not reactive. Because I believe that government should be a vehicle for progress in social, economic and foreign policy.
FOREIGN POLICY I am a Democrat because I believe that a foreign policy rooted in the almost arrogant belief that "God is on our side," is wrong, but rather that we should hope, as [ironically Republican] President Abraham Lincoln said, "that we are on God's side." I believe that war should be a last option, only after all diplomatic opportunities have been exhausted; I believe this in word and deed, a difference between the Republicans and Democrats. I believe that wars based on intentional misrepresentation and lies are wrong. That when a policy has turned out to be a failure, to alter it. I believe that the United States, as the last remaining military superpower of the world, has a moral obligation to help end genocide around the world, and that includes the continent of Africa! But that this belief in our international responsibility isn't taken by the leaders of our country as an excuse to inflict our way of life on people who live in different types of cultures.
EDUCATION I am a Democrat because I believe that education is a priority of our government, and that a free and excellent education is a right. I believe in investing in our schools, not offering vouchers for students to try to attend private schools, schools which are already turing away kids that can afford them...thus having the rejected students forced to return to an even more under funded public school. I believe in the arts, and that maintaining an arts curriculum is necessary in developing the creative side of our minds. I believe that the policy of "No Child Left Behind" is a failure, and that it promotes mediocrity, rather than excellence. That while it is important to measure success and progress, that high stakes testing have reduced each student to a mere test score.
HEALTH CARE I am a Democrat because I believe that just as it is our responsibility to protect our citizens from the likes of Osama bin Laden, it is also our responsibility to protect our citizens from the smallest of enemies; disease and illness. I believe that the current health care system which promotes profit over health is the wrong one. I believe that the insurance companies have had ample time to address the issues of the 45 million Americans that are uninsured, and have failed, thus it is the governments turn (and responsiblity) to protect it's citizens- just as they have done in other major western countries. I am a Democrat, because I believe that it is the moral responsiblity to ENsure that all of our citizens are INsured.
EQUAL RIGHTS I am a Democrat because I believe in equal rights and opportunity for all, regardless of race, gender, age, or sexual orientation. I believe that the 1500 state and federal rights not granted to same-sex couples is a severe breach in the rights of up to 10% of our nation's population. And while I believe that government should reflect the popular belief, it should also not infringe on the minorities rights just because the majority want to - why else do we have a Bill of Rights. A good leader does what is right when it is popular, but more importantly does what is right when at that point in time, it my not be politically popular. The cliche, "what is popular isn't always right," I believe, is something our leaders could learn when it comes to equal rights.
TAXES I am a Democrat because I believe in a progressive tax, one which each citizen pays their fair share of their income - the rich paying a larger percentage of their income than the poor. If this means that a person making $15,000,000 can't get that extra car or pool that he or she wanted, so be it, I don't believe that a progressive tax reduces the incentive for someone to succeed...because in America, when it comes down to it, the incentive is not a flat tax, but the idea that we will leave our children a better country with more opportunities than we had.
PRIVACY I am a Democrat because I believe that the overarching theme of the Bill of Rights and the Ninth Amendment (declares that the listing of individual rights in the Constitution and Bill of Rights is not meant to be comprehensive; and that the other rights not specifically mentioned are retained elsewhere by the people) grants the people of this nation a "right to privacy" and that under that right to privacy,the government should not be able to tap our phones without due process of the law (including the fifth amendment), should not infringe on a woman's ability to decide what she will and will not do with her body, and that what we do in our bedrooms is our own business, not the governments.
GUN CONTROL I am a Democrat because I believe that guns are not the solution to the problem, guns are the problem. I don't believe that any citizen outside the police force and the military should need assualt weapons. In other countries with stricter gun control laws, we see a lower homocide rate (proportionally as well as in actual numbers). Need I remind you that the father of modern conservatism, Ronald Reagan, was shot while being surrounded by the "best trained ARMED guards in the history of the world." I am a Democrat, because I don't believe that guns are a deterrant.
WAGES I am a Democrat because I believe that all of our working citizens deserve a livable wage. That the Republican Congress failed to raise the minimum wage while inflation went up 3X the level it was when the last wage hike was inacted is sad. I believe that it doesn't hurt small businesses when the minimum wage is increased, it only helps families - families who will now be able to spend more at those same businesses.
I am a Democrat because: I believe in "Freedom of Speech" I believe in "Freedom of Religion" and thus a "Seperation of Church and State" I believe in "Due Process of the Law" I believe in the "Freedom to Assemble" I believe in "Equality" I believe in "Respecting other nations" I believe in "Honest and Open Government" I believe in a "Right to Privacy" I believe in "Education"
And most of all, I am a Democrat because I am patriotic. And while I certainly love our flag, what i love more are the ideals behind that flag. I believe the true meaning of patriotism isn't the kind of blind patriotism that liberals and Democrats are so often accused of lacking, but rather a coming together of our people and community to SACRIFICE in order to build a stronger, better nation.
For those, and other reasons, I am a Democrat.
Posted by Tim McBride at 06:04 PM on Aug-06-2007
Senator Biden's New Book
Senator Joe Biden (D-DE) has written a new book that is coming out at the end of the month. Pre-order your copy today.
Recently, it was found that Senator David Vitter (R-LA) had visited a Washington D.C. escort service. Senator Vitter has spent an entire career condemning homosexuality and gay marriage. He has spent a career trying to protect traditional marriage. He says that gay marriage is the number one threat to traditional marriage. He has run on a family friendly platform. However, the people of his party believe it's okay to impeach somebody based on a lie about an affair and believe that the Democrats are the party of immorality and sin. The Democrats are the ones that are eroding away at our national morals. However, may I say adultery is not a crime. Prostitution is. What Senator Vitter did was not only disgusting but it was illegal. I think that paying some woman to engage extramarital sexual acts is more of a threat to traditional marriage than two loving men or women getting married and becoming good members of society. David Vitter should resign or he should be impeached for breaking the law and setting a bad example for America's youth. He has campaigned on family values but he has spat upon everything that is family values. He has demoralized women and paid for sex which is pathetic. When you get married Mr. Vitter, you make a commitment to your wife and when you have kids you set an example for them. Don't tell me how to live my life and turn around and sleep with a prostitute. Don't say that my gay friends are a threat to marriage when you hire someone to cheat with. What Bill Clinton did was also wrong but it wasn't illegal. David Vitter is an insult to the U.S. Senate. This isn't just cheating, this is prostitution. And another thing, at least Bill Clinton didn't have to pay.
Posted by Read Scott at 01:37 AM on Jul-17-2007 Comments (0)
Together We Stand Strong
Today, I would like to take a brake from my usual rants about Republicans and offer thoughts what I believe could be the greatest silent issue that we face. Today, we have an attitude, all of us, Democrat, Republican, and Independent, that it's everyone for themselves. No longer do we look out for our fellow man. Gone are the days of I am my brother or sister's "keeper." If someone is suffering we do not help him. If someone is struggling, we say "tough luck" and walk away. We only look out for ourselves and no one else. Some would say its enough work to look after yourself, but I believe strongly in what America used to stand for. We used to be a nation of compassion, of lending a helping hand, and of looking out for our neighbors. Take for example one of the worst times in American history the 1930's. There was the Great Depression and the loom of war from fascists. However, our president, Franklin D. Roosevelt called on our nation to stand up and fight back against these things. He kept an optimistic outlook and said the famous words, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself." He lead us to the greatest American recovery ever. However, today, we fear doing anything about major issues, such as healthcare, Iraq, the environment, and poverty. We think that it is too hard to deal with these things. We don't feel the obligation we used to, to help others. We can face these things head on, by uniting and keeping our head held high, and fighting for change. Why lay down our sword when the fighting gets tough? Why stop now? There are millions suffering and I feel if I stop, I will be turning my back on my fellow man. We need to stop being selfish. There are millions of people who aren't in the position to help themselves, and it is time we step up as a nation. Do we want to be remembered as a thug nation that bullies people or a compassionate nation that helps others and takes good care of it's citizens. There are people out there who are selfless, who fight the good fight. Firefighters, police officers, the men and women of our armed forces, veterans, and volunteers across our country. They step up without asking. Today I ask my fellow Americans to join in this fight for our nations future. Although, what lies ahead might seem tough, and scary, remember what FDR said. We can do this, if we unite. Divided we fall, united we will stand. If we don't compromise, if we don't work together, and reach across the barrier of politics and race and culture, then we will never succeed. I say this today not to call anyone out. We have all failed America, but we have look forward to the future. Lets keep our government accountable and lets fight for open government. Lets do something about Iraq. Lets stop poverty and insure every American. Lets fight those who say we can't. We shall overcome those who wish to hinder the awesome power of America and it's people. I love this country. This is why I say this today. The attitude of we are all on our own should be done. We are in this together. Remember it is the UNITED States.
Posted by Read Scott at 10:03 AM on Jul-10-2007 Comments (0)
Ending Poverty in America: A Question of Morality
There is often talk of our moral values as a nation. Today, it seems as if denying rights to gays, and barging into everyone's bedroom seems to be "moral." However, I believe the greatest moral question we as a nation will face, is what will we do as Americans to end poverty. Right now, 37 million Americans are considered impoverished, and our government has done little to nothing to held these Americans. People say the government shouldn't give handouts, that these people are lazy, and stupid, therefore, they don't deserve our help. Really these Americans are looking for a simple way out to make a better life for their children. Our government no longer is run based on a sense of a national morality, but we are run based on hate and fear of those who are poor. If we don't have compassion for these great people, then who are we as a nation? These conservative Republicans who want to cut every program helping the poor, consider themselves Christians, however, they speak about how gay marriage is unmoral, when Jesus spent his entire reign helping the poor, and preaching to fellow Christians to go and help people who are poor. The bible is littered with references to giving yourself to others, to help those at the lowest part of our society. Whose doing Christ's work now? America will not be remembered for how we treated the best off among us, but how we treated the worst off among us. Ending poverty is not political, it is moral. If we sit by and say no we will not help you to these people, then that reflects badly on us. These are good Americans who want a better life. if we do not do something now, then we will lose the America, that we all know and love.
More later. Stay tuned.
"...at the dawn of the 21st century we also have a collective responsibility to recommit ourselves to the dream; to strengthen that safety net, put the rungs back on that ladder to the middle-class, and give every family the chance that so many of our parents and grandparents had. This responsibility is one that's been missing from Washington for far too long -- a responsibility I intend to take very seriously as President."
-U.S. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL)
Posted by Read Scott at 10:34 AM on Jul-08-2007
Political Activism: An Endangered Species
For too long now our political process has been an area of society where the elite are more important. Our process has become something that only a few participate in. However, whose fault is this? How did we get here? The people are not to blame for this. Our elections have been the choice between two mediocre candidates. The phrase “the lesser of two evils” has become the most popular way to describe our elections. Our system is more about money and power then people and political ideas. Political consultants have tried to divide and wedge the voters apart. Politics has become taboo. Here is the cause of this problem. People do not participate in politics and the political process because politics and politicians have become less in touch with people and have lost the true meaning of America. Our government today is more interested in things that help their rich donors than the issues that matter in this country. They have in the past couple of years; proposed tax cuts for the wealthy, tax cuts for oil companies, and allowed loose business ethics laws. However, they have (in the past) refused to raise the minimum wage and give tax cuts to the middle class to strengthen the economy. They have refused to improve our healthcare and public school systems. All on loose arguments. Moreover, because of this, voter percentages have dropped to all time lows. In 2000, and 2004 under half of registered voters voted. In 1960 about 60% voted. Voters no longer trust politicians therefore; they have no incentive to vote. Moreover, the politicians of our country have ignored the issues that affect real people. Politics has been lost from national discussions. Candidates for various offices in these nations are no longer guided by a sense of public service. They rely on polls and money to dictate they actions. Our system is no longer regarded as prestigious as it was. Our system doesn’t work for us. Those who participate in politics and politicians were once regarded as high in society. They were looked up to and respected. Now, politics is considered a dirty business. People who enter politics seem to be slimy and dishonest. As a result, people do not choose politics as a career, but instead they avoid it like a bad cold. The word “Washington” has become synonymous with corruption. People regard politicians as the worst kind of people. It doesn’t matter how much good politicians do, they are almost always considered deceitful. This is a result of many political leaders who have deceived the public and have taken advantage of our system. Many public officials have made a mockery of the office they hold. Therefore, it seems impossible to rebuild the tainted image of politics. People no longer trust authority. They feel they will just be hurt again, because of the actions of past leaders. Today, elections, politics, and the American democracy has become about wedge issues, dividing America in two, pitting one against another. Our system used to be about an honest and open discussion of the issues and about making the lives of people better. g Although politicians try to imitate, the people know they are insincere. Since our leaders have treated their offices with such disrespect, the people have become political cynics who cringe when the word “politics” is said. Public service and democracy no longer has the meaning it used to. People do not want to hear what politicians have to say. People just don’t care anymore. They have given up on our public servants. This is because our public servants no longer care about us, and this is evident through the pork barrel spending and sloppy legislation that has come through in the past years. Political participation is at an all time low. People do not read the newspaper or watch the news, as much as they used too. People no longer have taken an interest in our nation’s leaders. Our political system is something that is extremely important. However, our leaders have made a mockery of it. They have turned our nation’s government into a place to advocate for thing they believe is important, not what the people think is important. They think with their wallet, not a sense of public service and patriotism. People often run for office as a means to make money for themselves and corporate interests. Politicians believe in what’s best for them, not best for the people. Now, the American people are disenchanted with political leaders. Politics is taboo. Politicians are thought if as slimy, dishonest, and insincere. Government is a line of business that is regarded as dirty. People no longer go into politics for the right reasons. Our system doesn’t work for us. As a result, our people do not take part in the political process and vote. People don’t exercise their civic duty. People do not write their congressman, call their senator, or volunteer for campaigns because they believe that government doesn’t work for them.
Posted by Read Scott at 06:34 PM on Jul-07-2007 Comments (1)
Rubber Stamp Mike
We have been in Iraq for about 4 years now, and since that time over 3500 young men and women have given their lives for this pointless war. We have spent billions on this war, and essential social programs in the United States have been crippled. In Delaware alone, we could build dozens of new schools, give health insurance to thousands of Delawareans, and provide affordable housing units to Delaware's lower income citizens, with the money we alone have spent on this war. These are vital issues. However, our Congressman, Michael Castle has continued to be a rubber stamp for this administration. Congressman Castle, you are either with the people of Delaware (70% oppose the war) or you are with President Bush. If you chose the second one, you are out of here. I am sick and tired of Mike Castle's indecisiveness and him putting his finger to the wind. He has failed us time after time after time after time. Thank God, we have Joe Biden being one of the greatest voices against President Bush's stupid surge. It's time for Mike Castle to go. We can't afford for him to be another rubber stamp for this administration. Mike Castle can be a moderate voice to end the war. However, he seems to be lock step with this president. When asked he said he "couldn't make up his mind" on what was best. Your constituents are calling on you to end this war, 70 percent in fact. Take a hint Mike. He doesn't get it. He can't end this war, because he is a loyal Republican. He has failed this state, this country, and the world as a whole. He doesn't have the judgment to lead anymore. I say, someone qualified run and beat this guy. I can't understand why we elect him. He hasn't done one thing for this state. Oh, wait, I think I am being unfair, he got the national state quarter thing up and going. Way to go Mike! Now, channel that energy into ending the Iraq War. Or are you to busy waiting for the Alaska quarter to come out. Take that quarter to buy an one way ticket out of town, and don't let the door hit you on the way out. For a guy who has been in congress for over a decade, a quarter program isn't a lot to show. Be the man you should be and vote against this president or we will beat you.
Posted by Read Scott at 05:38 PM on Jul-06-2007 Comments (0)
Above the Law
A few moments ago, President George W. Bush commuted Lewis "Scooter" Libby's prison sentenced after he was convicted of obstruction of justice amid the investigation of the leak of former undercover CIA agent, Valerie Wilson. Scooter Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, lied before a federal grand jury while participating in this investigation. He was accordingly sentenced to jail, and amid a storm of pressure upon the President to pardon him, he was commuted, and therefore will not serve his sentence. The Bush Administration has once again shown they are above the law. These people who argued passionately in favor of President Clinton's impeachment for the same offense, are now arguing that once a Republican does it, it's okay. A double standard? I think so. Scooter Libby who has shown a disregard for the law and has time after time shown his utter corruption has spit on the justice system and tried to wiggle his way out of paying for his crime. However, we have still seen no actions taken to hold Vice President Cheney accountable and we now see that nobody will be. Cheney now says he can't appear before Congressman Henry Waxman's committee because he is not part of the executive branch. This administration is hiding something, and has taken a lighter to the constitution. Convict Libby, send him to jail.
Posted by Read Scott at 06:16 PM on Jul-02-2007 Comments (0)
Healthcare: We Need Change
50 million, that's the number of American's without health insurance. 9 million, that's the number of children without health insurance. 18,000, that’s the number of people who will die this year because of that lack of insurance. Those are the facts and yet, were is the reform? In the 1990's, President Bill Clinton appointed his wife, then first lady, Hillary Clinton to head the President's Commission on Healthcare Reform. Hillary fought hard for universal coverage, but Newt Gingrich, the rest of the Republican congress, the health care industry, and conservative groups spent 100 million dollars to defeat the plan, and they did. Since the 13 years after the battle over health care, with 18,000 dying each year, about 234,000 people have died because of that lack of insurance. That is about 78 times bigger then the death toll on September 11, 2001. We have spent billions on Iraq and the War on Terror, and George W. Bush and the Republicans in congress choose to protect us against Osama Bin Laden and other terrorists. However, they refuse to protect us against our smallest enemy, bacteria and disease. Since, Richard Nixon decided to make our health care industry 100% profit driven in 1971, the system has turned into corrupt, greedy, and sickening industry, working against people. We give 100% free universal healthcare to captured terrorists in prison, people who planned September 11, but there are volunteer 9/11 rescue workers who can't afford health insurance. We spend more money on healthcare than any other industrialized in the world, we rank 37th in times of healthcare in the world, behind Cuba. There are nations who don't even hold a candle to our overall wealth, and have a lower infant mortality rate then we do. We think that universal healthcare would make our healthcare worse. While, nations with universal healthcare exhibit overall better health then those that don't. The unhealthiest people in England, those considered impoverished, statistically are healthier than those with the best healthcare in America. Only, 1 in 10 people in a Canadian hospital wait more than 3 hours in a hospital waiting room. 86% are seen within 30 minutes. On average Canadians live 3 years longer than Americans. A few years ago, I cut my finger, and I waited more than 4 hours in an extremely over crowded waiting room. Where was I? In America's wonderful healthcare system of course! I take daily a daily medication. Under our insurance plan, we pay 10 dollars for every refill. That's if you have insurance. In England, the most you will ever pay for drugs is 10 dollars. However, my medication is extremely cheap. We spend an average of $7000 per American, Cuba spends 200 per person, however, and Cuba has the lowest HIV/AIDS rate in the Western Hemisphere. An inhaler that will cost over 100 dollars in America costs 5 cents in Cuba. For all the talk over how universal healthcare is awful, I just don't see it. The facts seem to prove Mitt Romney, Rudy Giuliani, and John McCain wrong. The Republicans will tell you the lie of "access to affordable healthcare" when it really means, more money to the healthcare industry that kills thousands a year. The only way to fix our healthcare industry is universal coverage. What are some benefits? A more productive workforce, which means a booming economy and more jobs. France, which has the best healthcare system in the world, has a higher productivity rate than the United States. Nations with universal coverage have less workers taking off for sick time. On average we would save money with a universal system. More people would be healthy. Our medical industry would finally work for people. 9 million children would be covered. Gone would be the days of the money driven healthcare executives. Our healthcare industry would be the best in the world. America can afford universal coverage. The United Kingdom created their universal system in the wake of WWII when they had little to no economic stability. By easing our national economy on to it over the next 4 years or so, we would be able to easily switch to universal healthcare. This is the only way we can fix things. The argument that we will be become unhealthier and the healthcare industry will be more expensive if we convert to universal coverage holds no water. The facts are on my side. Our nation won't be remembered on how we treated the best off among us. It will be how we treated the worst among us. The 50 million uninsured. The 18,000 who will die this year.
VOTE DEMOCRAT
Posted by Read Scott at 03:26 PM on Jul-01-2007 Comments (1)
Get A New Attitude
2008 is a historical election. For the first time in American history a woman and an African Americans are the front runners for the Democratic nomination. However, there is something that is holding us back. It is not the usual gang of bigots that you would expect. In fact it may be your neighbors, your co-workers, and your friends and family. I meet many people who say, "Oh, I love Barack Obama, but this country isn't ready for a black president. I would vote for him, but I don't know if he can win because he is black." Many don't see the problem with that attitude and there lies our problem. When someone believes that this country isn't ready for a black president, then it won't be. When you say that no woman can be president, then they won't be. What seems like a small issue is holding back the essential tides of social change in America.
When someone holds this opinion they are holding back African Americans, and women, effectively saying that they are unqualified for office because of their gender and race. I say not only is America ready, but we must for the sake of social change be open about this issue. If you take the opinion that this country is ready, then we can change. If we keep saying election after election that we are not ready then we never will be. If you hold this attitude, then you are just as much as part of the problem as the bigots and the sexists. Both of you might think differently, but what you are doing is achieving the same goal. So if you like Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton or Bill Richardson, and you think that America won't elect them, make America elect them. Instead of saying the black candidate or the woman, say the candidate. Lets change and lets make America the country it should be.
Posted by Read Scott at 03:16 PM on Jun-29-2007 Comments (0)
Shame on You Mr. Copeland
Charlie Copeland is my state senator and as a constituent I am extremely disappointed with Mr. Copeland over his recent comments regards house bill 141, which is going to committee in the Delaware State Legislature soon. This bill would ensure that sexual orientation would be included in anti-discrimination laws. This means gay people can’t be fired for being gay. Mr. Copeland raised doubt based on that this bill would bring to many lawsuits against small business owners. Well, senator, let me ask you this, if someone is fired for being gay, don’t they have every right in the world to bring a lawsuit? Gay people are now the newest victims of American discrimination. Although I love my country and would die for it, I believe that what we are doing is extremely un-American. Remember who we are. We are the nation where everyone can be who they are. Being gay is not a choice, because who would want to go through what the gay community goes through. I have always tried to be a straight ally to the gay community, because I have seen that this community is no different from others. They are all hard working tax paying Americans. They want children like others do. They love like others do. They want to live a good life like others do. They want to do what’s right. They love America. Yet, we still deem it appropriate to deny them rights because they’re gay. Mr. Copeland and all other Republicans who opposed this bill are simply doing this simply because the bill has to do with gay people. If this had to do with African Americans, Hispanics, or women, there would have been a solution yesterday. But, since this bill has to do with gays we don’t do anything. They believe that gays are eroding away at our moral values as a nation. No, denying rights to gays is eroding our national moral values. So, any who oppose this bill should be ashamed of themselves for denying rights to people. No wonder why so many kids are scared to come out, when they have to face this world. This opposition to this necessary bill makes me ashamed. Ashamed that I live in a world, where good people are denied rights. To my gay friends, and for everyone to hear, I am with you. I will fight for you. I will not back down. I will not deter in this fight. My hat goes off to State Treasurer and candidate for governor, Jack Markell for fighting to pass this bill and being an ally of the gay community. Mr. Copeland, you will not win this fight, not this time.
Posted by Read Scott at 04:04 PM on Jun-20-2007 Comments (2)
Maybe It's Just Jealousy
My apologies to those who’ve been victims of my rants on the subject, but I have to say this one more time, if only for good measure… I don’t understand what we have against the French. There’s no doubt that the adjective “French” has attained something of a negative connotation in The States, but I have to question the logic behind it.
Posted by Mat Marshall at 08:27 PM on Jun-10-2007 Comments (0)
Run, Harold, Run!
Recently I joined my fellow executive committee members in attending a Carper Roundtable event with former Congressman and currant chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council Harold Ford Jr. of Tennessee. Although, I would consider myself a little more liberal than my good friend from Memphis, I was delighted by what he said. He talked about the rules of politics. He said that doing the right this was the number one rule. When he was speaking I saw a man who was genuinely concerned the lives of every person in America. I respect his governing philosophy because I think we need moderate and conservative voices in the party. It was truly a shame that Ford wasn’t elected to the U.S. Senate in 2006. He was my favorite candidate out of all of the senate candidates in 2006. I felt like his campaign was going to be a vehicle of change toward a new south. Then came the highly inappropriate ad by the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee. The ad opens with a couple people attacking Ford’s positions on a few issues. Then comes a beautiful girl who says, “I met Harold at the Playboy party.” Then after the ad closes the woman says, “Harold, call me.” This ad is a perfect example of what is wrong with our system. Harold Ford, a qualified man, was the victim of an ad that painted him as a playboy who was involved with many women. Harold Ford is a good man who is fighting for working families. He is someone who knows that America can do better. Seeing him speak made me hopeful for the future. So I say here today, Harold Ford must run for office again. America needs people like him governing. Harold Ford can bring about the changes in the south and in America that we need. He is smart enough and qualified to lead the Democrats to become the dominant force in southern politics again. A lofty goal, I may add, but a necessary one. I ask southerners are you satisfied with the Bush Administration leaving you behind time after time. They send your sons and daughters to war and they aren’t honest with you about the objective. The south is not where it should be economically or in terms of education. The south has some of the worst public schools in the country. The Democratic Party is the party of change. The party of the people. We fight for everyone. Harold Ford is a perfect example of this. He can lead our party to a bright future. We need young candidates like him. RUN, HAROLD, RUN!
Posted by Read Scott at 12:00 PM on Jun-10-2007 Comments (0)
Harold Ford Has Me Shivering
Yesterday (June 08, 2007), Senator Tom Carper (D-DE) and Fmr. Rep Harold Ford, Jr. (D-TN) spoke at Arsht Hall in Wilmington. For those of you who didn’t keep up with the midterms last year, Harold Ford was a moderate (a so-called “conservative democrat”) who left his seat in the house to run for the senate seat vacated by Bill Frist, and lost by only three points to Republican nominee Bob Corker. Today, he is the chairman of the Democratic Leadership Council (a position held by Bill Clinton shortly before his election as president in 1992), a vice-chairman of Merrill Lynch, and a visiting professor at Vanderbilt University in Nashville. YDM members were invited.
I had debated whether or not I wanted to go, because at this point in time, there’s something wrong with my eye, maybe pink eye. I decided to go, and managed (somehow) to beat my four fellow YDM-ers (Tim McBride, Read Scott, Chaz Hoard and Kyle Banta) to Arsht Hall by, give or take, 15 minutes. In that period of time, I stayed off to the side. When Harold Ford walked in, I had an opportunity to shake the man’s hand, but I sat it out and let him get some food and something to drink (which was the courteous thing to do). Ford, who is probably up to my chin, didn’t make a big thing of his entrance. He introduced himself very casually to some people at the door and made his way to the food and then out of the lobby. Eventually, my colleagues showed up and I got up with the rest of them. Several elected officials showed up, including John Carney and Chris Coons, and Jack Markell. Carper was kind enough to get the YDM-ers a photo-op with congressman Ford, whose hand I was absolutely delighted to shake by this time.
We went into the room in which the speeches were given, and started off with the usual fifty “thank you”s from Tom Carper. Carper gave a lackluster speech about his friendship with Ford, how he hoped to know Ford’s ambitions, how he supported him from the beginning, etc. I have to say, Tom Carper is a god-awful public speaker. He has this very monotone voice and stands like Frankenstein’s monster or something, which leaves a lot to be desired in terms of charisma. I wasn’t there to see Senator Carper, though; I was there for Congressman Ford.
Harold Ford and I don’t share the same views on everything – he’s a fan of Reagan’s, and was in support of the anti-gay amendment that gave the Christian Right a sizable erection – but he’s a fantastic public speaker. He feels genuine. Granted, as a politician, part of his job probably entails faking authenticity, but if he’s lying by being so open, (i.e., telling reporters “I like football and women” in reference to his appearance at Hugh Hefner’s superbowl party), he’s crazy. I could be wrong, but the guy seems like he’s not afraid of what people think, and while I don’t know how well that holds up in politics, I can’t help but like him.
So Ford’s giving his speech, a lot of which had to do with how, regardless of what the context is, you need to do the right thing, which is absolutely true. If everybody treated everybody better, there’s no reason we couldn’t have a perfectly functional society (of course, that’s a big “if”… see: communism). A lot of it is also revolving around how, for whatever reason, everything has to be liberal or conservative nowadays. There just doesn’t seem to be any in-between, which is true (Obama touched on that during his speech at the 2004 DNC). And then, occasionally, he gives Carper a little jab for going to Ohio State (even though Carper deserves more of a slap in the face after this whole thing with Markell).
Well, the speech finishes, and Read Scott (the vice president of YDM) stands up and asks Harold what he thinks of youth’s place in politics, paraphrasing Jack Markell’s speech on 5/19/2007 by saying, “People always say we’re the future of the party, but I don’t think we’re the future of the party; I think we are the party.” Read, you’ll have to remind me of Ford’s response – I was losing bits and pieces. Not because I wasn’t interested, but rather because I kept thinking to myself, “I’m 15 feet away from Harold Ford, Jr.”
The YDM-ers were going to dinner afterwards, but on the way out, we all shook Ford’s hand one last time. As Read shook his hand, he did what I think was very well on the rest of our minds, which was to ask Mr. Ford to run for Senate again. Harold’s response was, to say the least, encouraging. We got out onto Pennsylvania Avenue, turning onto Greenhill, and a silver minivan pulls up next to us. The man in the driver’s seat was a guy I had met during the Dennis Spivack campaign (I can’t remember his name right now, sorry), who, at the time, was Spivack’s driver. He now drove Carper around. Kyle inched the car forward and we all waved to the van. Out of nowhere, Harold Ford (who we didn’t even know was in the car) opens the door, leans out, and says something along the lines of, “Boys, those republicans don’t know what they’re thinking. You’ll have to show them a thing or two.” (pardon any heroic dramatization of Ford’s words, I’m still shaking from the experience).
Congressman Ford, I think I speak for all of us when I say that we absolutely will.
Posted by Mat Marshall at 10:48 PM on Jun-09-2007 Comments (3)
It's A Shame To See That We Have Yet To Open Our Eyes
Having looked for inspiration in all places, to no avail, I once again turn to the letters to the editor in The News Journal. As I’ve said before, the topics tend to be pretty tame. However, the News Journal never fails to publish a letter that gets my blood boiling.
“I'm glad to see that our police forces are taking the threat of terrorism seriously.
It's a shame that the rest of the public is not doing the same. We can never be to prepared [sic] in the event of another attack on our country. I'm glad to see someone else is taking this as seriously as myself. Maybe The News Journal could do an expose on how people abuse the federal and state governments for welfare, food stamps, housing and etc. But we would never see that because it would not be politically correct.
Posted by Mat Marshall at 09:24 AM on May-17-2007 Comments (1)
You Can't Fight A Losing Battle When You've Already Lost
I believe myself that the secretary of state, secretary of defense and — you have to make your own decisions as to what the president knows — this war is lost and the surge is not accomplishing anything as indicated by the extreme violence in Iraq yesterday.
The right wing reactionaries really seem to be taking Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's comment on the Iraq War very harshly. I suppose it's with good reason -- when you put enough effort into perpetuating a massive lie (that Iraq is worth it, and that a War on Terror can be won), you begin to believe it yourself.
First of all, look at the nature of this comment. The overwhelming majority of Republicans and Democrats believe, if not that we need to leave Iraq, that it was a huge mistake. If I wasn't watching it happen, I'd have a hard time believing that such an understatement actually came as a surprise. I find it astounding that anybody is actually making an effort to keep us is an apocalyptic hellhole like Iraq.
The other thing that astounds me is the Republican's arguments. Those are, that we need to prevent a civil war; that Iran has a huge stake in the insurgency and if we leave, they'll rally terrorists; that the majority of Iraqis want us to be there; and, to top it off, that a 20,000 troop surge will fix this Catch-22.
This civil war has been begging to happen for the past 1,400 years. Whenever you have religious radicals (Muslim or otherwise) at odds with one another, they absolutely will end up trying to kill one another. Hussein had that problem under control. Yes, he was a terrible man, but there wasn't a threat of civil war. When we destroyed the Iraqi government, we lit the fuse. more than 3,000 troops are dead, but you can fully expect 20,000 more if we follow through as President Bush is asking.
There is no credible proof that Iran is supporting the insurgency -- as a matter of fact, we should be compelled NOT to believe this, because the exact same (false) argument was made with regards to Iraq and Afghanistan. How many times will we be lied to? We bombed Afghanistan despite the fact that Saudis attacked us on 9/11, we invaded Iraq for an alleged link to Al-Qaeda and the alleged presence of weapons of mass destruction, and now we're staying in Iraq for more falsities. This administration is just begging to start two more wars. "Nuclear proliferation!!" they scream, hoping the American people will run like sheep to the voting booth and make the GOP mark on the ballot -- despite the fact that the largest, most powerful nuclear arsenal in the world belongs to the United States. And being that their entire justification for wars on Iraq, Iran and North Korea revolves around nuclear weaponry, it strikes me as overwhelmingly hypocritical. Before we start spewing lies about who does and doesn't have a nuclear arsenal, maybe we should disarm our own.
No Iraqi in their right mind wants us to be there. Perhaps the extremists should take a visit to Iraq. 70,000 civilians are dead. How many people were killed under Saddam? How many families in Iraq had available food, running water and electricity under Saddam? How many people in Iraq were blown up by car bombs for their religious preferences under Saddam? You can whine about what a terrible man Saddam Hussein was, but the fact of the matter is, Iraq was a better place under him. Democracy is no good if it's a crumbling, corrupt, dysfunctional democracy. As brutal as dictatorships may be, Iraq is now nothing more than chaos, and promises to implode upon itself.
As for the surge, the fact that President Bush thinks it will do any good should clearly establish that he is certifiably insane. The answer isn't more, more, more -- the answer is LEAVE. What crackpot neo-con actually thinks that 20,000 sitting ducks will solve anything? We're not fighting a military, we're fighting an ideology, which the Bush Administration has labeled as terrorism. The fact of the matter is that you cannot defeat terrorism. It will always exist, and if there IS a solution to the problem, it doesn't lie in violence. If you don't want somebody to attack you, look into preventative action. Stop putting military bases in Muslim holy land -- imperialism isn't a good foreign policy. And maybe, just maybe, we should be close to our friends and closer to our supposed enemies. Rather than flame France for not joining a doomed effort, we should respect their choice and maybe, just maybe, take a hint from their wisdom. Rather than attack Iran for an alleged nuclear program, we should try to amend our differences. We're not always right, and there is such a thing as listening to what somebody has to say before you attack them.
I'd like to leave this off with a message to the right-wingers saying that liberals like myself or Harry Reid don't care about the troops. It seems to me that you've been smelling your own bullshit so long that you don't notice it anymore. "Support the troops", you've cried for 4 miserable years. All the bumper stickers on the back of SUVs and minivans, all the pundits, all the lies we've been fed... they always say we need to support the troops. Well, the fact of the matter is that "the troops" are more than a buzzword. They're human beings. We have a responsibility not only to them, but every human being, to make life better. Liberals like me are trying to do that. We're trying to pull them out, to end the killing, but it's not easy when the president promises to veto any bill which will pull troops out of Iraq. 3,000 people died on 9/11. Over 70,000 have died in this war, American and Iraqi both -- that's a death every two days. It's not worth it. This is not retribution, this is madness. And if you do insist on keeping the troops there, show at least a little bit of support by giving the wounded a decent hospital to go to. Walter Reed is disgusting, as has been hidden from the public eye for the entire war. I don't believe for a second that the administration didn't know about the rats, the cockroaches, the mold, the lack of decent beds, heating, etc. Rather, I believe the administration just doesn't care. And why would they? Why would any Republican in their right mind? What's some poor farm boy matter to you? As long as Haliburton shows loyalty to its stockholders and we protect our investments, why does it matter? So what if he's lost arms, legs, vision, skin.... you can sleep easy at night knowing that you support the troops -- because as long as you say it, it must be true, right?
Posted by Mat Marshall at 04:21 PM on May-03-2007 Comments (6)
In Support of the Democratic Congress
This past week, I have been following the showdown between our President, George W. Bush and the leaders of the Democratic Congress (Love ya Nancy!). On November 7, 2006, Americans from across the nation voted for a change and an end to the Iraq War and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi have been working tirelessly to do just that. You see, we Democrats are trying to accomplish the will of the American People by ending this war bit by bit. We are trying to do the best we can. Mr. Bush, in case you haven't looked at polls lately Nancy Pelosi and Democrats in Congress have approval ratings over 50%, something you haven't seen in a while. The American People are with us. The time where you attack us for not supporting the troops is over. Let me say clearly, President George W. Bush will veto a spending bill, money being sent to the TROOPS! Whose supporting the troops now? We are trying to bring them home safely. And unlike you Mr. Bush, we want to give them the best care when they come home, cough, cough WALTER REED! We are trying to carry out the will of the American People. You say that we are making it more difficult to bring the troops home, and that we are extending their tours with our persistence and doing the job we were elected to do. Just this week Secretary of Defense annouced he was extend the tours of all troops in Iraq. This president is as my good friend Joe Biden said is divorced from reality. Well, Joe, I don't think he was married to it in the first place. He has gone off the deep end and so has Vice President Cheney. They has betrayed America and American Servicemen and Women. They are disgrace. And they have lost this war. Yes, I say it lost. We must get our of Iraq. Every month we stay there more Americans die, more blood is spilt. Mr. Bush you do not represent the will of the people. Yet, your party pretends that we are the party destroying America. Mr. President, you are to blame for America's problems. It's time you leave this false sense that things are going well. Americans did not vote for a surge, they voted for an end. They want us to leave. The Democratic Congress understands this. This is the most couragous congress in history lead by too great Americans Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. The only reason I have hope is because of them. So, if one more person says anything about this congress, remember we are doing the people's work.
Posted by Read Scott at 05:54 PM on Apr-28-2007
A Left-Winger's Take On The Debates
First of all, I couldn't be happier that an end to the Bush administration is in sight. This is one of the most disastrous presidencies this country has ever seen, if not the most, period. With the GOP failing to offer up any respectable candidates for president (no surprise), it has become the responsibility of the Democrats to take the oval office once again.
That said, I was less than impressed with Thursday night's debates. As it stands, I'm torn as to who I support for this election and the debates didn't make it any easier. As a matter of fact, I feel that the candidates have only strengthened the stereotype that Democrats are unable to get their acts together. It seems to me that almost everybody at the debates suffered from ADD.
Especially representative of this is Governor Bill Richardson of New Mexico. Besides his crooked political views (there's a reason that the NRA is so fond of him), he seemed entirely unable to listen to directions. When asked what he would do his first day in office, Governor Richardson gave a 3-day schedule. When asked about relations with Castro's Cuba, Richardson answered a question asked earlier in the debate, regarding a scenario in which two American cities were simultaneously attacked. It seems to me that if this guy can't even debate properly, he has no place in the seat of a diplomat and a leader.
Senator Mike Gravel (D - AK) is interesting, to say the least. He showed way too much emotion, going so far as to lash out on Barack Obama:
"Who the hell are we going to nuke? Tell me, Barack. Barack, who do you want to nuke?"
Obama had done nothing to provoke this remark. Gravel strikes me as a second coming of Al Sharpton -- somebody who will speak their mind (however shriveled it may be) with no worries of how it will affect their doomed campaign.
Kucinich has his heart in the right place, but has no chance of winning. He carries many bona-fide liberal ideas that I think all of us should (a push for universal health care, stricter gun control, etc.), but doesn't seem to be able to carry himself in a reasonably stable way. He constantly brought up his views on Iraq. I can appreciate that he's passionate about the topic -- Iraq is proving to be a monumental dilemma and will go down in history as being one of the worst decisions the American government has ever made -- but there's more to talk about than Iraq. His opinions are nothing new. Innumerable members of both parties agree that Iraq is a huge mistake and that priority #1 should be finding a way out. In that sense, he's a good Democrat, but a terrible candidate.
I am by no means a fan of Hilary Clinton's -- her views on censorship are too conservative for my liking -- but she was one of the only candidates who performed respectably during this debate. Both pre-debate and post-debate, MSNBC viewers voted her as the 3rd best candidate, after Barack Obama and John Edwards.
Obama, Edwards and Biden are the only ones who I'd like to see in office at this point in time. As anybody who pays attention knows, the race is ultimately between Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama. Obama is closing in on Hilary in the polls, but without a monolithically favored candidate, it's anybody's guess as to who will actually get the nomination. For now, I can only hope that the Democrats manage a win next year. I don't know if America can survive another GOP president.
Posted by Mat Marshall at 05:24 PM on Apr-28-2007 Comments (0)
Barack Obama: the Next Great American President
I have never been as excited ever for a candidate in my entire life than I am for Barack Obama. Barack Obama is the greatest leader of our generation. Unlike most candidates he can bring this nation together and make people hope again. He makes me proud to be an American. Looking back on the Bush administration, Obama makes me believe that the future is going to be better. I feel as if he is talking with me rather than at me. He is the man who is going to carry on the work of past progressives who were taken from us, people like, Paul Wellstone, Robert F. Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and so on. He is this generation's Robert F. Kennedy. He stands up for all us, regardless of who we are. He wants to end this war, he wants to improve education, and bridge the racial divide in this nation. At the center of his campaign is the power of young people. Not since 1968 have young people been more involved. Watching him in that debate, I saw a president, a leader, a gift to the American People. This man is the way of the future. He wants universal healthcare, and believe that America can do anything. So let me say for the world to hear, I will do anything this man asks of me. I will work my hands to the bone, I will give up sleep, I will give up my weekends, my summer for this man. I know that when this man is elected, there will be a sunrise all across America. Hope will be restored. We can kiss the politics of fear good bye. So my friends join with me in following this man to the future of America. Let us stand up and take back our country.
Posted by Read Scott at 02:34 PM on Apr-28-2007
Good News for Dems!
Bush Approval: 35%
Speaker Pelosi Approval: 53% (Gingrich never got more than 41%)
Democrats in Congress Approval: 54% (Republicans have 39%)
Stronger Leadership Role in D.C.: Bush: 34% Dems 54%
Should the Attorney General resign: Yes: 45% No 39%
State Treasurer Jack Markell's Favorable: 55% (only 11% unfavorable)
-Delaware Polling from "Fairleigh Dickinson PublicMind Poll"
Also, Democrat Byron Short won in traditionally Republican territory of the 7th State Rep District in Brandywine Hundred, bringing the Republican's to only a 21-19 lead over Dems in the State House, with one Vacancy.
That vacancy is in the 41st RD, and the Dems have an excellent candidate Former State Trooper and Former Mayor of Millsboro Lynn Bullock!
These polls and the candidates and election results are excellent news for Delaware and National Democrats in '08!
Note: Post polling is from 4/16/07 and DE polling is from 3/1/07.
Posted by Tim McBride at 06:20 PM on Apr-17-2007
Money: the Disease that is Killing our Politics
Recently, all the news networks in the United States reported on the fundraising efforts of all the candidates for 2008. Barack Obama raised 25 million, 1 million short of Hillary Clinton's 26 million. This was the big story of the week. Although I am 100 percent for Barack Obama for president, I must say that money is not what makes presidential candidates. Tom Vilsack, a good man dropped out of the 2008 field, because he couldn't raise enough money. This is what our politics have come to. We are more interested in who raises how much, then who is going to do what for what issue. Campaigns are about the people, ideas, and the future of our country. They are not about money, money, and did I mention money. I propose today that all campaigns be publically financed. If we want money and influence to be taken out of our politics and be returned to the people, we can't have the system we have today. We must change our ways and say to the candidates: SAY SOMETHING. Tell us about your ideas on national security, the economy, and education. Let that be what you campaign is ALL about. It's time they start talking. Candidates are spending most of their time dialing for dollars. Money for breakfast, money for lunch, and money for dinner. Democracy and politics isn't about money, it's about your hopes, dreams, and fears. However, our system is a game that only the rich can pay to play. Our pay to play system must end. Therefore, in accordance with this belief, I will not give one cent to campaigns. Instead my contribution to democracy will not be 2300 dollars, but volunteer hours, knocking on doors, passing out literature, and talking about the issues. I am going to draw attention to this problem. McCain-Feingold is a crock of bull. It's time we take the money. Let's rebuild democracy, one person at a time. Let's make our democracy be about what it should be: people. And to all those who say money is speech, I say: NO IT ISN'T! Money does not equal speech then only the rich can speak and the rest of us are left behind. You want to know what speech is: it's writing to the editoral board of your local paper, writing your own blog, writing and calling your elected officials, attending rallies, and VOTING! Money is the farthest thing from speech. Democracy is speech. People are speech. America is speech. So if you agree with me leave me a comment and go to www.house.gov or www.senate.gov and look up your congressmen and senators and tell them you want publically financed campaigns.
Posted by Read Scott at 11:48 AM on Apr-08-2007 Comments (0)
Somethings Don't Change: A Liberal Rant (Yes, I said Liberal, and PROUDLY)
George W. Bush said this week that he would veto any Iraq War spending bill that contained a timetable and criticized the Democratic Party or as he likes to say the "Democrat" Party for "playing politics" with war funding. Well, Mr. President obviously your new to reality, so let me refresh your memory. There was this event that we Americans like to call an election in 2006 and the party that overwhelmingly won was the Democratic Party. We won because we said we would bring an end to this war. We are doing exactly what we were elected to do. So, my hat goes off to Senator Harry Reid and Speaker Nancy Pelosi to keeping their promise to the American people. Last week, a bill passed in the U.S. House and Senate that was a spending bill but it also contained a timetable that would call for America to start withdrawing troops in 2008. This bill sums up the overwhelming public opinion of nearly 65 or more percent of our population. So, Mr. President, if you veto this bill, you will be vetoing the OVERWHELMING belief of the United States that this war must end. Wake up and see with don't stand with you. We want an end to this war. There is a difference Mr. Bush to being like President Truman and making the right decisions that weren't popular and totally and utterly screwing up and creating the worst foreign policy blunder in American history. There is one big difference between President Bush and President Truman: Truman was a man whose leadership in the long run helped this country, he was smart. Mr. Bush what you are doing ceases to amaze me. You have overstepped the realm of political sanity and have gone nuts. I can no longer hold in my feelings and allow this president to disgrace this land I love so much. Oh, yes and another thing: don’t question our patriotism. You Mr. Bush and you Mr. Cheney are traitors. You have disgraced your office. Therefore, you have to be pretty damn audacious to question the Democrat's patriotism. You might not say it explicitly but I know you think it. You have led America into a classic catch-22. So I just have one thing to say to the Republican Party: I will NEVER vote for ONE GOP candidate unless you change your way. How you have conducted yourself over the past years, shows me that you have no respect for democracy, no respect for the world, and I seriously question your motives. However, I do not question your patriotism. I believe you are a blind patriot. You rap yourself in the American flag and cut yourself off to the world. You think that supporting our president is more patriotic than exercising freedom of speech to protest him. And one more thing, before I step off my soapbox, this week Mr. Bush, you said that Nancy Pelosi's trip to Syria was a mistake and undermined U.S. foreign policy. However, what you fail to see is that what Nancy Pelosi is doing is new to you, it's called DIPLOMACY. She is sitting down with a government we don't agree with and is trying to help our country. Any good solider will tell you, you have to talk to your enemies. We must exercise diplomacy. So, Madame Speaker I applaud you. So, the next time you Republican's open your mouth, remember this: the Democrats are for people. We are doing this because we were voted in office to do so. We are going to fix this country. And to America, don't vote Republican in 2008; they still haven't learned their lesson.
Posted by Read Scott at 08:00 PM on Apr-05-2007 Comments (0)
Karl Rove Dancing!
Quite possibly the funniest thing I have ever seen.
Enjoy, Read Scott
Posted by Read Scott at 06:55 PM on Mar-29-2007
To Elizabeth Edwards and Her Family:
The Young Democrats Movement joined the nation in expressing our great sadness today in the wake of the news of Elizabeth Edwards' reoccurrence of breast cancer. YDM extends our undivided support for Elizabeth and her family. Her courageousness continues to be an inspiration to us and people around the world. This is a day to put aside politics and pray for such a great woman. Whether Democrat or Republican we can all come together to support her and her family. Whatever decision Senator and Mrs. Edwards’s make about the future of their campaign they have the 100% backing of this organization. Elizabeth Edwards is a fearless woman and is a heroine to men and women everywhere. We too stay optimistic with the Edwards Family because we know how tough Elizabeth is. Again our thoughts and our prayers are with the Edwards family in this time of need. Stay strong Elizabeth, America loves you!
Kindest regards,
The Young Democrats Movement
Please join the fight against cancer at:
www.cancer.org
Posted by Read Scott at 09:19 PM on Mar-22-2007 Comments (0)
Say NO to the Surge
The War in Iraq is the worst foreign policy blunder in American history. The American death toll is well over 3000. Innocent Iraqi death tolls are in the 10,000s and climbing. There is more violence today then there was when Saddam Hussein was in power. George W. Bush has advocated a reckless policy of “stay the course” for 3 years and has furthered American debt. Now, George W. Bush is proposing a surge of more than 20,000 troops to Iraq. This policy, like previous policies, comes too late. We should have gone in with more troops when we invaded Iraq. In terms of foreign policy, you cannot make up for your mistakes this late in the game. Bush should’ve admitted failure earlier, and taken action then. This surge is irresponsible, reckless, and sloppy. It seems to be a “quick fix.” Bush hasn’t thought this out and has ignored the recommendations of more experienced and better foreign policy experts. James Baker and Lee Hamilton are arguably some of the best foreign policy experts in the nation. Both have held important positions. Jim Baker was President Bush Sr.’s secretary of state and Lee Hamilton is a former congressman (D-IN) and former co-chairman of the 9/11 Commission. This, past year they headed the Iraq Study Group, which recommends several courses of action to find a peaceful solution to Iraq. Bush has ignored every one. Moreover, he has ignored the recommendations of the chairman of the foreign relation committee and senator from Delaware for the past 32 years, Joe Biden. Biden proposed cutting Iraq into 3 states for the 3 religious groups in Iraq fighting each other. However, President Bush would rather take the advice of those were wrong from the start. He wants to lengthen and escalate the war for a cause that has already been lost. What this nation needs to do is reject this reckless course of action. Write your congressman and senators. Say you oppose this irresponsible course of action and this surge. We must support a phased withdrawal plan that would put pressure on the Iraqi government to take action and stand up for their country. We cannot escalate this war. We cannot continue this violence. We must end this war as soon as possible and start rebuilding the little international credibility we have left.
Posted by Read Scott at 01:53 AM on Feb-11-2007 Comments (0)
Gubernatorial Poll
The results of our poll of the Democratic Primary:
Jack Markell - 100% John Carney - 0%
Note: This is not a scientific poll, nor is it a poll that reflects the entire YDM organization (this poll in no way impacts our organization's endorsement process).
Posted by Read Scott at 05:41 PM on Feb-09-2007
Presidential Poll
The results of ydmovement.org's first poll are in!
Barack Obama - 58.82%
Joe Biden - 20.59%
Hillary Clinton - 8.82%
John Edwards - 8.82%
Chris Dodd - 2.94%
Note: This poll is not scientific, and while people can't vote more than once, it does not represent a cross-section of any population, except those who visit the ydmovement.org website.
Posted by Tim McBride at 06:02 PM on Jan-24-2007 Comments (1)
"Do Something Congress!"
This week, the United States House of Representatives under new Democratic control, wrapped up it's first 100 hours. With 13 hours to spare, Congress, under the new leadership of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, passed much needed 9-11 Commission recommendations, a stem cell research bill, an increase in the minimum wage (the first in 10 years), a decrease in student loan interest rates, and ethics reform. The fate of all these bills aren't certain. While the minimum wage is likely to be increased, it is not likely to be this specific bill. The Senate, where the Democrats only hold a one seat majority, is likely to pass a similar bill, differing in its tax breaks for small businesses. If that bill passes the Senate, then it will go to the House. If it passes the House, then the President will receive it for his signature or veto. Stem cell research, which was passed by last year's Republican Congress, was passed once again this month by the U.S. House. President Bush vetoed the last stem cell research bill, and has said he will do the same to this one.
Posted by Tim McBride at 10:24 AM on Jan-19-2007 Comments (1)
Welcome!
Welcome everyone to our new blog page. We will be posting political news on this page, as well as opinions and editorials written by youth and adults. Continue to check in!
Posted by Tim McBride at 10:14 AM on Jan-19-2007 Comments (9)
Welcome!
buy tramadol online: this link buy tramadol online salacity might
Welcome!
cheap carisoprodol: this link cheap carisoprodol introfaction thulite
Welcome!
cupronickel: this link cupronickel injunction nonuniformity
Welcome!
metformin: this link metformin excavate costly
Welcome!
buy soma: this link buy soma quiescent bandlimitation
Welcome!
losartan: this link losartan semicontinuos chocolate
Welcome!
psxpflli: lcdybqvq this link xwkpemlf dxfsszcx [URL=this link]sdciksfh[/URL] Welcome!
Richard: Your correct Joe Lieb. These democrats are trying to make a story out of Sarah's duaghter being pregnant. The difference between Republicans and dem...
Welcome!
Joe: Comments are welcome unless they differ from the YDM then they are deleted.
Shame on You Mr. Copeland
Mat: Read, as usual, I agree with you for the most part here... however, I think it's unfair to ONLY say that Republicans are opposing it beacuse it's in s...